Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Sewell

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 8, 1911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Boyle Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge O’Rear

Affirming.

*172Appellee was section foreman, working on appellant’s road in Boyle county. The boarding car was stationed at Mechanicsburg, where there was a station and siding, but not a telegraph office. He was required to begin work at six o’clock in the morning, with his crew of men, who went from the boarding car to the point at which they were at work, some two miles distant, on a hand car. There was a fast through passenger train to pass Mechanicsburg at 5:09 a. m. On August 23, 1907, appellant was awakened by the cook at five thirty, and breakfasted and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Lovell's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fleck v. Harmstad, KingsleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Jones' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MoranCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Meyers' Administratrix v. C. & O. Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API