Mendia v. Garcia
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND MOTIONS TO DISMISS
MARIA-ELENA JAMES, United States Magistrate Judge
INTRODUCTION
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Bernardo Mendia’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a). Mot. to Am., Dkt. No. 101. Defendants John M. Garcia, Ching Chang, and the United States of America (collectively, “Defendants”) filed an Opposition (Dkt. No. 102), and Plaintiff filed a Reply (Dkt. No. 103). Before Plaintiff filed his Motion for Leave to Amend, Defendants sought to dismiss…
2Cases cited134 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Robillard v. Opal Labs, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
- Hamidi v. Serv. Emps. Int'l Union Local 1000District Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Flores v. Velocity Express, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Microsoft Corp. v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
- Bradley James Mrozek v. T. IsamanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2026
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.