Wilson v. Gamble
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.
The appellees are physicians and copartners who are now, and were for a number of years prior to 1928, engaged in the practice of their profession at Greenville, Miss., in connection with which they own and operate a well-equipped medical clinic. In 1926' they employed J. F. Lucas and R. E. Wilson, both of whom were young physicians just beginning the practice of their profession, under an oral contract to assist them in rendering professional service to their patients. The terms of this contract were not introduced in evidence, but it is evident therefrom that the terms must have been in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sivley v. CramerMississippi Supreme Court · 1913
- Townsend v. HurstMississippi Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by29 opinions
- New Castle Orthopedic Associates v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Wellspan Health v. BaylissSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Foltz v. StruxnessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
- Frierson v. Sheppard Building Supply Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963
- Iredell Digestive Disease Clinic v. PetrozzaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.