Legal Opinion

Iredell Digestive Disease Clinic v. Petrozza

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 15, 1988No. 8822SC245PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

The question presented by this case is whether the trial court erred in denying a request for a preliminary injunction sought by a covenantee-professional association (plaintiff) to enforce against a physician-covenantor (defendant) the terms of a covenant not to compete contained in an employment agreement. The trial court concluded that the plaintiff had failed to present evidence sufficient to establish a likelihood that at trial the plaintiff would be able to show that the covenant was not void as against public policy. We agree.

Plaintiff is a professional association…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. A.E.P. Industries, Inc. v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Ridge Community Investors, Inc. v. BerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. New Castle Orthopedic Associates v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. State v. Fayetteville Street Christian SchoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Manpower of Guilford County, Inc. v. HedgecockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Weber v. TillmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  2. Murfreesboro Medical Clinic, P.A. v. UdomTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Calhoun v. WHA MEDICAL CLINIC, PLLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Jeffrey R. Kennedy, D.D.S., P.A. v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Wade S. Dunbar Insurance Agency, Inc. v. BarberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API