Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Reifenhauser KG Maschinenfabrik
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided April 4, 1984No. Civ. A. No. 81-368PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
COFFRIN, Chief Judge.
Defendant has objected to the magistrate’s report and recommendation that defendant be compelled to answer interrogatories and requests to produce propounded by the plaintiff and that defendant’s motion for a protective order be denied. Defendant is a West German corporation that manufactured a machine in which plaintiff’s son was killed. This action, brought by plaintiff as the administrator of his. son’s estate, is approaching the beginning of its third year of discovery. The question posed is whether the plaintiff must now comply with provisions of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Pain v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Ralph E. Vorhees, to His Own Use and to the Use of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Nancy Vorhees, His Wife v. Fischer & KreckeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. First National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Superior Ct.California Court of Appeal · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Robert J. Boreri v. Fiat S.P.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. British Aerospace, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Gebr. Eickhoff Maschinenfabrik Und Eisengieberei mbH v. StarcherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Anschuetz & Co., GmbhCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Bakala v. BakalaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.