Legal Opinion

Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 26, 1925PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action of contract to recover the balance due from the defendant as surety on a bond, which was given to the plaintiff to dissolve an attachment in a suit brought by it against Stuart-Howland Company and was approved by the court on August 4, 1919. The bond recites that Stuart-Howland Company as principal, and the defendant as surety “are holden and stand firmly bound and obliged unto” the plaintiff- “in the full and just sum of fifty thousand dollars;” the condition being that “if the above-bounden Stuart-Howland Company shall pay to the plaintiff in said action the amount, if…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Union Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  3. Guaranty Security Corp. v. OppenheimerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Leventhal v. KrinskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  2. Broadway National Bank v. HaywardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Hill v. WileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Alabama General InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. James Stewart & Co. v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API