Legal Opinion
Hill v. Wiley
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 21, 1936PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, J.
The respondent Wiley had been one of the trustees under the will of William H. Hill. He had also been a trustee under the will of Daniel Chamberlin. As trustee under the Chamberlin will Wiley gave a probate bond in the penal sum of $50,000 on which the respondent American Surety Company of New York was surety. The petitioners are the present trustees under the will of William H. Hill.
The petition which was brought in the Probate Court alleged among other things that the respondent Wiley, having earlier misappropriated funds of the Chamberlin trust, then misappropriated securities of the Hill…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Allen v. Puritan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Allen v. South Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Newell v. HadleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Green v. GaskillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Allen v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jones v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- National Shawmut Bank v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Leventhal v. KrinskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- French Lumber Co. v. Commercial Realty & Finance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Brown v. LeightonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.