Legal Opinion

United States v. Norwood

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 1, 2010No. 08-30050PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

The opinion filed on February 17, 2010 is amended as follows:

On slip opinion page 2510, the first sentence of the second paragraph at Headnote [4] is deleted, and replaced with the following: “In sum, we are convinced beyond any reasonable doubt on the basis of all the remaining evidence adduced at trial that the jury would have convicted Nor-wood on the elements of the possession with intent to distribute offense regardless of the challenged affidavit.”

With this amendment, the panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Tallman…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Samuel Orozco-AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Koenig v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. United States v. Matus-ZayasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. State v. JasperCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. United States v. Valdovinos-MendezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API