Legal Opinion
Koenig v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided September 21, 2010No. 42S04-1009-CR-505PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
Max Koenig was convicted of dealing in a schedule II controlled substance. Koe-nig contends the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation when it admitted a laboratory report without giving him the opportunity to confront the person who created the report. The Court of Appeals held the error was harmless, believing there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction without the lab report. We affirm the conviction, not because there was "sufficient evidence" of guilt without the report but rather because its admission was harmless beyond a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Marq Hall v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
- Thomas Mack v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Ryan E. Bean v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Sandefur v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Michael A. Lane v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.