Tyrrell v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYERSON, Presiding Judge.
This case presents a previously unconsidered application of Ronquillo v. Industrial Commission, 107 Ariz. 542, 490 P.2d 423 (1971). Petitioner Raul Tyrrell contends that respondent State Compensation Fund cannot invoke the Ronquillo rule against his wishes and thereby deny him the benefit of having his second industrial injury treated as a scheduled injury. Despite our concern that the application of Ronquillo under the facts of this case deprives petitioner of a statutory compensation benefit, we nevertheless conclude that Ronquillo forecloses petitioner’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ronquillo v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Turner v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Camis v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Hurley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Van Sickle v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gladys v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998