Legal Opinion

People v. Townsend

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1971No. Crim. 18597PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AISO, J.

Defendant James Lee Townsend was charged by information with having committed felony batteries upon Officers Everett Bentley (count I) and Andrew Heider (count II) in violation of Penal Code sections 242 and 243. 1 A jury found defendant guilty on count I, but not guilty on count II. Defendant’s motion for a new trial and request for probation were denied, and he was sentenced to state prison with the minimum term specified to be six months (Pen. Code, § 1202b). Defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction.

Contentions on Appeal

The errors alleged to have been committed by…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. CarmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. People v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. RochaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Christal v. Police CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. HeffingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. People v. CoreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Melendez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  5. People v. CoreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API