Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Corey

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1978No. Crim. 20258Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

*747CLARK, J., Concurring and Dissenting.

I dissent from that portion of the majority opinion concluding defendant is not guilty of violating Penal Code section 243.

Section 243 prohibits battery “against the person of a peace officer” when “engaged in the performance of his duties.” We must therefore determine what duty rested with Officer Anderson upon observing defendant’s conduct. The majority recognize an off-duty municipal police officer possesses a continuing status as a peace officer. (Pen. Code, § 830.1.) However, they argue he is not “engaged in the performance of his duties” when, in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. HookerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. People v. TownsendCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API