Bongaards v. Millen
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtJacobs, J.
In her last will, Jean Bongaards stated that she had intentionally made no provision for her husband, George Bongaards. Following Jean’s death, George filed a complaint for declaratory judgment in the Probate and Family Court seeking a determination that real estate purportedly held in trust by her be treated as a part of her estate for purposes of his spousal claim under G. L. c. 191, § 15.3 After a hearing on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment, the judge ruled, in effect, that the real estate was trust property not subject to a spousal claim, and entered judgment in favor of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cellucci v. Sun Oil Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
- Cellucci v. Sun Oil Co. of PennsylvaniaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. ReiserMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Stuart v. SargentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Rogaris v. AlbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bongaards v. MillenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Bongaards v. MillenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Carlson v. MayerMassachusetts Superior Court · 2012
- Harris v. PHH Mortg. Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- In re MoiseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.