Legal Opinion

Casey v. First Bank

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Barnes county; E. T. Burke, J. From a judgment in defendant’s favor and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFisk, J.

Plaintiff sues to recover damages for the conversion by defendant of 405 bushels of wheat, alleged to have been the property of plaintiff at the date of such alleged conversion. The answer amounts to a general denial. The issues were tried to a jury, and a verdict in defendant’s favor was returned, upon which verdict a judgment was entered accordingly. Thereafter a motion for a new trial *213was made and denied, and the appeal is both from the judgment and from the order, denying the motion for a new trial.

The grain in controversy was grown, during the season of 1906, upon land owned by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gull River Lumber Co. v. Osbrone McMillan Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Ross v. RobertsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Bristol & Sweet Co. v. SkappleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Aronson v. OppegardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Libby v. BarryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kuntz v. McQuadeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Kersten v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Rickel v. ShermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Anderson v. MeideNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  5. McKenzie v. HilleboeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API