Legal Opinion

Hardin v. Baynes

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 1, 1944No. 14931PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. Under the Code, § 81-1002, a general demurrer to a petition seeking temporary and permanent injunction, accounting, and cancellation, may be heard and determined by the judge at an interlocutory hearing before the appearance or first term. Ga. L. 1925, p. 97; Meena v. Piedmont Realty Co., 173 Ga. 844 (162 S.E. 144); Huson Ice Coal Co. v. Covington, 178 Ga. 6 (172 S.E. 56).(a) Nothing to the contrary was ruled in Justice v. Warner, 178 Ga. 579 (2) (173 S.E. 703). While the plaintiff in that case sought both injunction and cancellation, no demurrer was filed, and it was held that the judge…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Krueger v. MacDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  2. Lewis v. FoySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Martin v. HarwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Browning v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  5. Thompson v. BoyceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hulsey v. Interstate Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  2. Jackson v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  3. Luke v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  4. Henderson v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  5. Moore v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API