Legal Opinion

Harrison v. State Bank

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1911No. 6,968PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Cass Circuit Court; John S. Lairy, Judge. Action by the State Bank of Monticello against George Harrison. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFelt, J.

— Suit upon a promissory note. Judgment for $114.15 in favor of appellee, from which this appeal is taken.

The complaint is in the usual form and is answered by denial, plea of payment and want of consideration. The motion for a new trial is based on alleged error of law, and the insufficiency of the evidence to support the finding. The overruling of this motion is the error assigned and relied upon for reversal.

*569The evidence shows, without controversy, that appellant, on August 23, 1904, was not indebted to appellee, but was indebted to Gustabel & Co. in the sum of $328.35, and on that date,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Potter v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Miller v. BillingslyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Felton v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Waterman v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Harger v. . WorrallNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Millett v. Aetna Trust & Savings Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API