Legal Opinion

United States v. Cordoba-Murgas

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 7, 2005No. Docket No. 04-3131-CR(L), 03-3350-CR(CON), 04-3554-CR(CON)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge.

We are asked to determine whether a defendant who has been indicted for possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a), with no particular quantity specified in the indictment, may be sentenced to a term of imprisonment longer than the statutory maximum for a violation of that crime with an unspecified quantity of drugs, if the defendant admits to a specific quantity in his plea allocution which would allow for the longer sentence. The Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Sattazahn v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harris v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  2. United States v. SantanaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  3. Hugo Galviz Zapata v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Cordoba-MurgasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. FabianDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API