Legal Opinion
United States v. Keith Cimera
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 24, 2006No. 05-2360PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
Appellee-Defendant Keith Cimera, the former manager of a check cashing store in Montclair, New Jersey, was convicted by a jury for his participation in an illegal check cashing scheme involving fourteen fraudulent checks. Several months after his conviction, Cimera moved for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33 based on “newly discovered evidence.” That evidence, he claims, are deposit account numbers on the back of five of the fraudulent checks which are different from the deposit account numbers on the others, indicating that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Rodriguez-MarreroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- United States v. JaramilloCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Neil Saada and Isaac Saada, A/K/A ZuckieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Wayne Earl EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Robert Elia Iannelli, A/K/A Bobby ICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. John Vitillo, Vitillo Corporation and Vitillo Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Phillips v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009
- United States v. Maldonado-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- United States v. QuilesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.