Legal Opinion

United States v. John Vitillo, Vitillo Corporation and Vitillo Engineering, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 25, 2007No. 19-1017PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROTH, Circuit Judge:

In this white collar criminal case, we address the scope of 18 U.S.C. § 666, which prohibits theft from programs, receiving federal funds, by agents of the organizations which administer those programs. Specifically, we consider whether an independent contractor with managerial responsibilities may be an “agent” under § 666.

John Vitillo, Vitillo Corporation, and Vi-tillo Engineering, Inc., were charged with several counts of theft, in violation of § 666(a)(1)(A), and conspiracy. A federal jury convicted each defendant on all counts. Defendants filed a Fed. R. CRim.…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. United States v. KempCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. HuetCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. Paul BergrinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Ashley AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API