Legal Opinion

Crofford v. Armstrong

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 6, 1961No. 15688PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Justice.

The suit of appellees was for damages under Art. 4004, Yernon’s Ann.Civ.St. (Actionable Fraud) incident to a transaction involving real estate and corporate stock. On trial to jury, a verdict was rendered of $22,500 actual damages and $25,000 exemplary, which became basis of the judgment rendered. Additional to his defenses, appellant had impleaded his former wife in a cross-action, claiming right to contribution in case the alleged false representations (which he denied) were established; annd upon hearing, such cross-action was stricken; defendant duly appealing from these…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Watkins v. JunkerTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Texas Co. v. State & Duval County Ranch Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Hamilton v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Sibley v. Southland Life Ins. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Baum v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc. v. George P. Mitchell, George P. Mitchell v. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Juneau v. MilamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. Tisch Family Foundation, Inc. v. Texas National Petroleum Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API