Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Soter v. Snyder

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1954No. 8160Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHenriod, Justice

(concurring and dissenting) .

I concur except as to that portion of the main opinion that affirms the trial court’s conclusion that respondent have title to the property as well as judgment for the price, and that such title be retained until the judgment is paid in full. There is respectable authority for such conclusion, as evidenced by the A.L.R. citations which give the authorities on both sides of this problem, but where, by and large, the cases representing the view expressed by the majority opinion, are from the south and east, and not from the Pacific Reporter states. These latter seem…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commercial Credit Co. v. Phoenix Hudson-Essex, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1927
  2. First National Bank v. MarloweMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Geroy v. UpperOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Doughty v. LaubachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Mathews Piano Co. v. MarkleNebraska Supreme Court · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API