Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Beil v. Mahoning Valley Distributing Agency, Inc.
Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas
Decided August 8, 1960No. 159612PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*429OPINION
By MAIDEN, J:
Sec. 2905.343 R. C., enacted by the 1959 Legislature and effective November 12, 1959, reads as follows:
“The court of common pleas has jurisdiction to enjoin the sale and distribution of obscene prints'and articles, as specified:
“(A) The prosecuting attorney, the chief executive officer of a municipal corporation, or the chief legal officer of a municipal corporation, in which a person, firm, or corporation sells or offers for sale or distributes or is about to sell or distribute or has in his possession with intent to sell or distribute or is about to acquire possession…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Urbana ex rel. Newlin v. DowningOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Hanby v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Hollington v. RiccoOhio Court of Appeals · 1973