Legal Opinion

Hollington v. Ricco

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 1973No. 31908 and 31933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, J.

This appeal presents highly important questions involving efforts by law enforcement officials of the city of Cleveland to halt the flow of obscene literature within its boundaries. Through seven assignments of error, appellants assail practically every facet of these efforts, including the enabling legislation, the procedural steps taken to secure the restraints, and finally the restraints themselves.

On March 27, 1972, a Cleveland city prosecutor and several police officers entered the bookstore of the appellant Joseph Ricco, on orders of the chief police prosecutor to search for and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Helman v. Epl Prolong, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Sovereign News Co. v. FalkeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1977
  3. State v. BurgunOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. State v. VladOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Carter v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API