United States v. Juvenile Male
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The clerk is directed to hold the mandate pending further order of the court.
The opinion filed September 10, 2009, slip op. 13109, and appearing at 581 F.3d 977 (9th Cir.2009), is hereby amended as follows:
1. Slip op. at 13124, line 21: after and before, insert the following footnote:
Our reasons for distinguishing Doe apply as well to
Russell v. Gregoire, 124 F.3d 1079 (9th Cir.1997) and Hatton v. Bonner; 356 F.3d 955 (9th Cir.2004). Russell and Hatton rejected Ex Post Facto challenges to sex offender registration requirements for those convicted of sex offenses…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Juvenile MaleSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. Juvenile MaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. ValverdeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. UteschCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. W.B.H.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.