Legal Opinion

United States v. Juvenile Male

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 27, 2011No. 09-940PublishedCited by 161 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court of Appeals in this case held that the requirements of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), 42 U. S. C. § 16901 et seq., violate the Ex Post Facto Clause of the Constitution, Art. I, § 9, cl. 3, when ap plied to juveniles adjudicated as delinquent before SORNA’s enactment. We conclude that the Court of Appeals had no authority to enter that judgment because it had no live controversy before it.

I

Respondent Juvenile Male was 13 years old when he began sexually abusing a 10-year-old boy on the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation in Montana. The abuse continued for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by161 opinions

  1. Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Jordan v. SosaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. Blackie Alvarez v. Jean HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Bishop v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  5. Haaland v. BrackeenSupreme Court of the United States · 2023

156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API