Legal Opinion
People v. Radus
Syracuse City Court
Decided March 7, 1985PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Louis H. Mariani, J.
The defendant’s motion to dismiss for denial of her right to speedy trial compels the court to discuss whether the time period between defendant’s initial arraignment on a felony complaint and its reduction to a misdemeanor is chargeable solely to the People.
Extensive affidavits were submitted by both counsel. Given the general agreement as to facts and dates, a hearing was unnecessary (People v Gruden, 42 NY2d 214; People v Thill, 75 AD2d 709 [4th Dept 1980]) and the court relies on the record created at the oral agreement, together with transcripts of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. GrudenNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. HamiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Peolpe v. McCafferyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- People v. ThillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. StoneburnerSyracuse City Court · 1985