Janow v. Conoco Pipe Line Co.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Turnage
¶1 Montana’s Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, dismissed this action based upon Stephanie Nicole Janow’s failure to file proof of service of process with the Missoula County Clerk of Court within three years after the action was commenced, as required under Rule 41(e), M.R.Civ.P. (1999). Janow appeals. We affirm.
¶2 Janow states the issues on appeal as:
¶3 1. In light of this Court’s orders of September 28,1999, and November 16, 1999, adopting Rule 4E, M.R.Civ.P, and deleting Rule 41(e), M.R.Civ.P. (1999), did the District Court err in dismissing Janow’s claims?
¶4 2. Did the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Haugen v. Blaine Bank of MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Groves v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Neuhausen v. NachtsheimMontana Supreme Court · 1992
- Schmitz v. VasquezMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Eddleman v. Aetna Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1998
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hawkins v. HarneyMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Claire Pesarik v. Gabriel PerjessyMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Renville v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Claire Pesarik v. Gabriel PerjessyMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Maffit v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.