Citibank (South Dakota), NA v. REIKOWSKI
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Sarah Reikowski appeals the district court’s order (1) denying her motion to vacate summary judgment, (2) granting Citibank summary judgment, (3) denying her motion for a new trial, (4) denying her motion to vacate the order which vacated the stay of litigation pending arbitration and (5) dismissing her counterclaim. We conclude the first two issues are disposi-tive because litigation should have been stayed after Reikowski filed her motion for stay and to compel arbitration. We therefore vacate the order for summary judgment and judgment, and reverse the order denying…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Elder v. HollowaySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- City of Hot Springs v. Gunderson's, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. LarsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Citibank (South Dakota), NA v. ReikowskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Weiss v. Thi of New Mexico at Valle Norte, LLCNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
- Weiss v. THI of N.M. at Valle Norte, L.L.C.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012