Legal Opinion

Citibank (South Dakota), NA v. Reikowski

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 2005No. 20050043PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Sarah Reikowski, now known as Sarah Reikowski-Hart, appealed from a default judgment and a denial of her motion for relief from the default judgment. We conclude the trial court misapplied the law in denying Reikowski’s motion for relief from the default judgment, and we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I

[IF 2] On July 20, 2004, Citibank sued Reikowski, alleging she had failed to pay Citibank $13,612.45 due on a credit card account. Although Reikowski corresponded with counsel for Citibank, she did not formally answer, and in October 2004, Citibank moved for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Suburban Sales & Service, Inc. v. District Court of Ramsey CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Perdue v. ShermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. T.F. James Company v. VakochNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. US Bank National Ass'n v. ArnoldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. LillehaugenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. $33,000.00 United States CurrencyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Discover Bank v. Bolinske, Sr.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Gustafson v. GustafsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Schwan v. FoldenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Citibank (South Dakota), NA v. REIKOWSKINorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API