Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Houston Clinic

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 10, 1931No. 9558PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLane, J.

On and for some time prior to the 2d day of August, 1927, S. R. Hoffman, plaintiff in the suit hereinafter mentioned, was an employee of the Keen Wolf Oil Company,-a “subscriber,” as that term is used in the Workmen’s Compensation Statute of Texas, who at such time held a policy issued by the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company under the provisions of said compensation statute. While Hoffman was performing his usual duties for his employers, and while at labor in their machine shop, a piece of steel struck him in his left eye and lodged therein, and at about the same time and while he…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of Baltimore v. LowryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Hanson v. PonderTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  4. Messmer v. Bell & Coggeshall Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  5. Lancaster v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McKelvy v. BarberTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Fauver v. BellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  3. Sunray Oil Corporation v. AllbrittonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  4. Vesel v. Jardine Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Hanson v. NortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API