Legal Opinion
Jay Johnson v. United States Treasury Department William Von Robb, Commissioner United States Customs
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 20, 1994No. 18-55818PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Per curiam
Jay Johnson has brought a race discrimination complaint against the United States Department of the Treasury and related defendants (collectively, “Treasury Department”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16. See Johnson v. United States Dep’t of the Treasury, 939 F.2d 820, 821 (9th Cir.1991). The district court entered summary judgment in favor of the Treasury Department, and Johnson appealed. We affirm.
I
Johnson, a black male, asserts that, the Treasury Department discriminated against him by failing to promote him to the position of Director of Labor Management at Customs in Los Angeles. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Norman v. Apache Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Ramee Jamal Shah, Aka: Eddie Harris, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Rosario Ramirez v. Fox Television Station, Inc. Chuck Ammann Nancy FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Jay Johnson v. U.S. Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Wendell Lyons Donald Tate Robert L. Claiborne Rosevelt Willson v. Gordon R. England, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Kraus v. Presidio Trust Facilities Division/Residential Management BranchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Rosemary B. Greenlaw v. H. Lawrence Garrett, Iii, Secretary, Department of the Navy B.J. McMillin Richard B. Cheney, Secretary, Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Kathleen M. Anderson v. Janet Reno, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Girard v. RubinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.