Legal Opinion
Rosario Ramirez v. Fox Television Station, Inc. Chuck Ammann Nancy Ferguson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 14, 1993No. 91-56233PublishedCited by 120 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Chief Judge:
This appeal primarily concerns jurisdiction. It requires that we determine, first, whether we have appellate jurisdiction and, second, whether the district court had removal jurisdiction. Ramirez appeals from the district court’s dismissal without prejudice, in which she charged that her employer, Fox Television Stations, Inc. (Fox), discriminated against her on the basis of her national origin. Fox argues that we do not have appellate jurisdiction because the district court’s-, dismissal was not a final decision. Ramirez asserts that we have jurisdiction, that the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- John C. McGuckin v. Dr. Smith John C. Medlen, Dr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- Rezi P. Forshey, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Daniel Campbell v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Balcorta v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- MSR Exploration, Ltd. v. Meridian Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Partington v. BugliosiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.