Legal Opinion · Dissent

Melvin Wilner, D/B/A Wilner Construction Company v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 26, 1994No. 92-5161Published

1DissentBennett, Senior Circuit Judge

Today the court has taken a significant step, overruling fifty years of precedent, abolishing the rule on evidentiary admissions seriously unquestioned until now, and agreeing with the government’s position against contractors doing business with the government. The majority’s stated reason for this position is that it is mandated by the Contract Disputes Act (CDA) of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 605(a), 609(a)(3) (1988), which requires any appeal to the United States Court of Federal Claims (Claims Court)1 to proceed de novo without binding reference to evidence produced before the agency board or a…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API