Legal Opinion
Mudd v. Caldera
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 14, 2001No. CIV.A. 97-2946(PLF)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
The Court previously granted plaintiffs first motion for summary judgment with respect to Count One, which resulted in a remand to the Secretary of the Army, and dismissed the other two counts of the complaint. See Mudd v. Caldera, 26 F.Supp.2d 113 (D.D.C.1998). After the Secretary’s decision on remand, this case is back before the Court on plaintiffs second motion for summary judgment and defendants’ cross-motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. As a result of the remand, Count One effectively has become moot and the issue now…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hamdan v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Calloway v. HarveyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Piersall v. WinterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Chambers v. GreenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.