J.W. ex rel. D.W. v. C.M.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge
Appellant challenges the district court’s order granting custody of his biological daughter to the child’s foster parents. Appellant argues that the district court erred or abused its discretion by (1) permitting the foster parents to intervene; (2) concluding that it is in the child’s best interests that custody be awarded to the foster parents; (3) ordering temporary supervised visitation; (4) ordering appellant to undergo a parenting evaluation; and by (5) *690admitting the guardian ad litem’s report into evidence. The temporary visitation order is unappealable…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Marriage of Pikula v. PikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Wallin v. WallinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Welfare of the Children of L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- In Re The Matter of: Pamela Annette Bowman v. James John WieczorekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017