(HC) Meza v. Pfeiffer
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RONALD MEZA, No. 2:20-cv-2316 JAM KJN P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 MICHAEL PALLARES, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent filed a motion to dismiss this action alleging the 19 petition was filed beyond the one-year statute of limitations. Petitioner filed an opposition; 20 respondent did not file a reply. As set forth below, the undersigned recommends that…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pliler v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Willie Lee Miles v. K.W. Prunty, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.