Legal Opinion

Henderson v. City of Sheridan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1920PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Yamhill: Haery H. Belt, Judge. Department 2. This is a suit brought to enjoin the City of Sheridan from the collection of an improvement upon Bridge Street in said city.

Read the full summary

From Yamhill: Haery H. Belt, Judge. Department 2. This is a suit brought to enjoin the City of Sheridan from the collection of an improvement upon Bridge Street in said city. Section 59 of the charter of Sheridan is as follows: “Such notice must be given by the recorder by order of the council, and must specify with convenient certainty the street, or part thereof, proposed .to be improved, or of which the grade is proposed to be established or altered, and the kind of improvement which is proposed to be made and the time when the council will hear and determine objections and remonstrances…

1Opinion of the CourtMcBRIDE, C. J.

The object of requiring notice of the proposed improvement, and of incorporating therein a description of the improvement with convenient certainty, is to enable the property owners abutting the street to be improved to make a reasonable estimate of the probable cost, so as to determine whether or not he will remonstrate against the proceeding. Of course, such description is not required to be technically accurate, but only as nearly so as the circumstances will reasonably permit. Such a description, with plans and specifications, must be made in any event, before the contract is let; and a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clinton v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Bank of Columbia v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Jones v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Ladd v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Rubin v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bass v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Edwards v. Johnston Formation Testing Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1930
  3. Aluminum Co. v. Sterling Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  4. Byers v. City of SheridanOregon Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API