Legal Opinion

Dermedy v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 14, 1910PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Certiorari to Muscatine District Court. There was a contempt' proceeding against plaintiff for tbe violation of an alleged liquor injunction. Tbe plaintiff was found guilty, and fine and imprisonment were imposed. He bas sued out a writ of certiorari in tbe nature of an appeal from sucb order.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

One Orr filed information against tbe defendant charging bim witb tbe violation of a liquor injunction entered some years ago in tbe case of Kessinger against Eirst National Bank and others, a suit to which tbe informant Orr was not a party. Nor was tbe defendant a *622party to such suit. The decree of injunction in such previous case provided, among other things, that the defendants and “each of them are further enjoined from using said building or premises or any part thereof as a place for the sale or keeping for sale of intoxicating liquors in violation of law, or permitting the same to be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. First Congregational Church v. City of MuscatineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
  2. Silvers v. TraverseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  3. Manderscheid v. District Court of Plymouth Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  4. Childs v. McChesneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  5. Donnelly v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hutcheson v. Iowa District Court for Lee CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  2. United Packing House Workers (C. I. O.) Local 38 v. BoyntonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  3. State v. HiattSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  4. Harris v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. Jones v. LevisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API