Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Robertson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Notwithstanding the trustee’s deed recites a bid of $5.00, it is competent to show by parol, or otherwise, the real consideration or the true terms of the bid. Pate v. Gaitley, 183 N. C., 262, 111 S. E., 339. For this purpose, the report of the trustee (if, indeed, any were made), whether required to be filed by law or not, is competent as evidence, as the trustee was a party to the transaction. It is well settled in this jurisdiction that when a party to a transaction makes a statement as to its terms, orally or in writing, the declaration may be offered in evidence either to corroborate or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Baber v. HanieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Baber v. . HanieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Pate v. . GaitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Oliver v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Allen v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williamson v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Burke v. SweeleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1941