Legal Opinion
Tucker v. Neal Oil Corp.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 5, 1953No. 12507PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAVES, Justice.
■ This statement made by the appellants of the nature and result below of this suit, is adopted as being substantially correct, to-wit:
“This is a suit upon a sworn account brought , by Neal Oil Corporation, as plaintiff, against Orrin Tucker, Homer W- Snowd.en, Allen Borton, and C. E. Bradshaw, as defendants * * *. Defendants Tucker and Snowden duly filed answers containing, among other things, sworn denials of such sworn account * * *. Thereafter plaintiff filed unsworn Motion for Summary Judgment * * * which was granted by the Court * * *. None of the defendants…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United North & South Development Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Pittman v. Bloch Queensware Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Evans v. JeffreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Doll v. MundineTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Nunneley v. WeilerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hill v. Floating Decks of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corporation v. SlackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Toliver v. BergmannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Womack v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Five Star Energy Corp. v. SowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.