Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Neal Oil Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 5, 1953No. 12507PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

■ This statement made by the appellants of the nature and result below of this suit, is adopted as being substantially correct, to-wit:

“This is a suit upon a sworn account brought , by Neal Oil Corporation, as plaintiff, against Orrin Tucker, Homer W- Snowd.en, Allen Borton, and C. E. Bradshaw, as defendants * * *. Defendants Tucker and Snowden duly filed answers containing, among other things, sworn denials of such sworn account * * *. Thereafter plaintiff filed unsworn Motion for Summary Judgment * * * which was granted by the Court * * *. None of the defendants…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United North & South Development Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Pittman v. Bloch Queensware Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Evans v. JeffreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  4. Doll v. MundineTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Nunneley v. WeilerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hill v. Floating Decks of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corporation v. SlackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Toliver v. BergmannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Womack v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. Five Star Energy Corp. v. SowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API