Legal Opinion

Doll v. Mundine

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1892No. 7320PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Ho statement is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

FISHEB, Judge,

Section B. — This suit is by appellee Mundine against appellants, for 250 acres of land, a part of the Thomas Morrow league, situated in Lee County. Appellee asserts title to the land in controversy by virtue of a parol partition between him and the parties from whom appellants acquired title. The appellants deny that a parol partition of the land was ever made, and further, plead not guilty. The purpose of this suit is to establish the lines and boundaries agreed to in the parol partition and to quiet plaintiff in his title and to remove cloud therefrom. Judgment was rendered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robinson v. MartelTexas Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Hill v. Floating Decks of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Sullivan v. First Nat. Bank of FlatoniaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Montgomery v. GibbensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API