Legal Opinion

(HC) Hill v. Hatton

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 18, 2019No. 2:16-cv-02124Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RYLAND G. HILL, JR., No. 2:16-cv-2124 DB P 11 Petitioner, 12 v. ORDER 13 HATTON, WARDEN, 14 Respondent. 15 16 Petitioner, formerly a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed an 17 application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

while incarcerated. The 18 matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and 19 Local Rule 302. Both parties have consented to the undersigned’s jurisdiction in this matter. 20 (See ECF Nos. 6,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Wilson v. CorcoranSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Greene v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Marshall v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Ortiz-Sandoval v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API