Legal Opinion
Greene v. Fisher
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 8, 2011No. 10-637PublishedCited by 648 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), a federal court may not grant habeas relief to a state prisoner with respect to any claim that has been “adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings” unless the state-court adjudication “resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States.” 28 U. S. C. § 2254(d)(1). We consider whether “clearly established Federal law” includes decisions of this Court that are announced after the last…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by648 opinions
- Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Wilson v. SellersSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Brown v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Shinn v. KayerSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Ledford v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
643 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.