Legal Opinion

Delannoy v. Grammatikos

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 1932No. Docket No. 8474PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

Plaintiff commenced an action to recover damages for injuries sustained in an automobile collision. The owner of the automobile appeared and answered by interposing certain denials and pleading contributory negligence. The insurance carrier of the plaintiff’s employer appeared and filed a complaint in intervention. The defendant answered the complaint in intervention. A trial was had before the trial court sitting with a jury. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and from the judgment entered thereon the defendant has appealed.

In the afternoon of the twenty-sixth day of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Olsen v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Wahlgreen v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Hoy v. TornichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Lowell v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Scott v. SheedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Alexander v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Bramble v. McEwanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API