Legal Opinion
Andrews v. Heinzman
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided February 1, 1949No. Civil Action No. 740PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DELEHANT, District Judge.
A motion, under Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for a summary judgment of dismissal of this action in its entirety or for the limitation of the issues to be tried in it has been made by the defendants and exhaustively argued and briefed by counsel for the respective parties. But, since the court’s conclusion upon it is such that trial in the ordinary manner must be had in respect of a portion of the property at which the complaint is directed, prudence counsels present silence upon much of the material which has been presented to and considered…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Walling v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Weisser v. Mursam Shoe CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- McElwain v. Wickwire Spencer Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Fishman v. TeterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. Metals Disintegrating Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Stuart Inv. Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1951
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. GinsburgDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
- Saddle River Tp. v. Erie R.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1949