Tate v. Griffith
Supreme Court of Georgia
Practice. Brief of evidence. New trial. Amendment. Before Judge Brown. Pickens superior court. April term, 1888. Peported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Bleckley, Chief J ustiee.
A hill in equity filed by Tate against Griffith and' Tate was tried and a verdict rendered for the complain*154ant. The defendants moved for a new trial on the general grounds that the verdict was contrary to law, evidence, etc.' A so-called brief of evidence was approved by the presiding judge, ordered to be.filed, and filed in the month of July. In September following, the motion came up for hearing, and the respondents therein moved in writing to dismiss the same, “ for the reason that no brief of evidence has been.filed in terms of the statute, the only brief of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ford v. HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
- Methvin v. BexlySupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
- Walker v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
- Vanover v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
- Howard v. MunfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cutis v. GeigerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Mann v. Tallapoosa Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Sisk v. SiskCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Whidby v. FeaginsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961