Legal Opinion

Howard v. Munford

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 7, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Accounts. Verification. Evidence. Debtor and creditor. Fraud. Mistake. Equity. Burden of proof. Evidence. Amendment. Practice in superior court. Before Judge Fain. Bartow superior court. January term, 1887. Reported in tbe decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

Howard brought an action against Munford for $2,500. The declaration contained several counts, and presented two aspects, — one as a demand for money had and received for the use of the plaintiff, the other as an account for money generally. After verdict for the defendant, the plaintiff *167moved for a new trial on about thirty grounds, and a new trial was denied. The real case, though expanded in the record to great bulk, may be condensed into a few paragraphs.

Howard and Chamberlain were indebted to Munford, and turned over to him a furnace with its appurtenances to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ford v. HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  2. Vanover v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trustees of Academy v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Kello v. Kello's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  3. Tate v. GriffithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API