Legal Opinion

Snodgrass v. Lamunyon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 11, 1923No. 12402PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

Defendant in error procured judgment in the justice of the peace' court, and on appeal, also in the district court, for .$94.15. He. pleaded a cause for damages to his automobile due to the alleged negligence of plaintiff in error, done by the wife of plaintiff in error in driving the car of plaintiff in error, and also pleaded the promise of plaintiff in error to pay for the labor and parts required to repair said automobile. The answer was a general denial.

Defendant in error testified:

•‘Well, I asked Mrs. Snodgrass what we were going to do about it, and she said it was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kesler and Dodson v. CheadleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  2. Byrd v. WoodsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Mohawk Refining Co. v. TowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mann v. WelchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Pepin v. W. R. Thompson & Sons LBR. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Kimbrel v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API