Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Woods

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 2, 1920No. 9686PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Marshal] County; Jesse M. Hatchett, Judge. Action by Henry Woods against Ed Byrd. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This action was commenced in a justice of the peace court at Madill, Oklahoma, on February 2, 1916, and thereafter appealed to the district court of Marshall county. The bill of particulars filed by defendant in error alleged that the defendant, Ed Byrd, was indebted to him in the sum of $172.48 for goods, wares, and merchandise sold and delivered to said defendant. The plaintiff in error in his answer denied each and all of the allegations contained in the bill of particulars, and further answers as follows:

“Further answering, said defendant states that the contract upon which the cause, of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Theis v. Board of County Com'rs of Beaver CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. May v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Shuler v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Richardson v. Parker, McConnell & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Amons v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Kirkpatrick v. Oil Well Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Cales v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Snodgrass v. LamunyonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Mohawk Refining Co. v. TowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API