Legal Opinion

Cauble v. Dahl

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1956No. 33392PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

This is an action to recover for personal injuries and property damages resulting from a collision between plaintiff’s pickup truck and defendants’ passenger automobile. The collision occurred at the uncontrolled right-angle intersection of College place and Forty-fifth avenue southwest, two streets in the city of Seattle, each of which is twenty-five feet wide. The plaintiff is the so-called disfavored driver. The defendant Roger Dahl is the so-called favored driver. At the close of the evidence, the trial court denied defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. Thereafter, the jury returned…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. FennerWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Vercruysse v. Cascade Laundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Blackburn v. GroceWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Glick v. RopesWashington Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cowan v. C., M., ST. P. & PAC. R.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Harvey v. UngerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  3. Burns v. DillsWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Cowan v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Broze v. RandallWashington Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API